Rope (1948)
is one of Alfred Hitchcock's most intriguing films, and was quite
experimental for its time. Aside from the opening credits, the
entire movie was filmed in real time on the single set of an
apartment. Furthermore, it was filmed in a series of very long takes
(most are 7-9 minutes) and edited in such a way as to give the
impression of the nearly the entire film's being a single shot. In
1948, this was technically impossible because a single reel of film
could hold about only 10 minutes of footage. Hitchcock masked his
cuts using techniques like panning across a man's back or piece of
furniture so that the screen would go dark for a moment and the cut
could be made, and the effect of the pan made it appear seamless.
There are only four undisguised cuts in this 80 minute film, and even
those were planned to occur at the moments when the movie theater
projectors of the day would have to change reels during a screening.
Okay,
so I know that bit of trivia has nothing to do with In Cold
Blood, but I wanted to share it
because I think it's pretty interesting. Nevertheless, there are a
few things about Rope that
I did consider in relation to In Cold Blood
as we were reading and discussing Capote's non-fiction novel. The
most basic connection is that both deal with a murder committed by
two men; however, Hitchcock's protagonists, Brandon and Philip commit
their murder with the belief that their getting away with the crime,
committing “the perfect murder,” will prove their superiority
over other men. Although Dick and Perry's motivations are different,
Capote still presents them as having similarly inflated senses of
self. Even so, I must admit that I didn't make the Rope
connection immediately. That
didn't occur until Luis mentioned that Dick and Perry, and possibly
Capote and Perry, might have had a sexual relationship. Rope
is based on a play that was
inspired by the case of Leopold and Loeb (if you don't know this one,
look it up on Wikipedia, it's a chilling piece of our Chicago
history), and the film has a very strong queer subtext. Of course
the film had to get past the censors of 1948, so there is nothing
overt in it, but both Brandon and Philip are discernibly coded as gay
and so is their former professor, played by Jimmy Stewart. The
actors who played Brandon and Philip were both gay in real life as
was the screenwriter; and the discussion that Brandon and Philip have
about how they felt during the murder is a clear allusion to gay sex
(not entirely sure how I feel about that one though...)
There
is certainly a homoerotic element in Dick and Perry's relationship as
well, but it is difficult to determine to what degree this might have
been an invention of Capote's. Still, Dick frequently refers to
Perry as “honey” and “baby,” and both are presented as
something of sexual misfits, not quite fitting into a heteronormative
portrait. Perry has a history of sexual abuse, Dick is something of
a pedophile, and they seemingly attempt to hustle men while in
Mexico. I also read a critical essay online that argues that the
Clutter family's murder is a result of Perry's missing the
opportunity for a gay encounter with Willie-Jay. Of course, like
Rope, none of these
instances do a great job of promoting positive images of gay
culture—apparently we're all murders—but this was a different
time. Being gay was still considered a mental illness; and any
potentially gay characters that appeared in the media (coded, of
course) were almost inevitably homicidal villains; and if they
happened to be sympathetic, they likely commit suicide. (If you're
interested in this part of movie history, I recommend The
Celluloid Closet.)
I
can't help but wonder how the homoeroticism of In Cold
Blood might have played out in a
different time. The film Capote hints
at Capote and Perry's possible relationship, but even so, it's still
a subtext. I think that there are the beginnings of a very
interesting critical analysis here, but I'm not up to that challenge
at this point. I still want to talk about Dial M for
Murder, so like the rest of
them, I'm going to shelve that “queery” for now...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.