I wanted to post my thoughts about my initial reaction to
the book and my response to the fact that Steinbeck really didn’t take the trip
to America’s heartland, as he said he did, separately because it didn’t really
change my opinion of the book, but it did answer a few questions I had about
the text.
As mentioned, my opinion of Steinbeck’s Travels with Charley didn’t change when I learned that Steinbeck
padded the truth in the book because I believe that regardless of whether his
trip was real or imagined that his attitude about the world around him would have
remained the same—which is what I focused on when I read this book.
Steinbeck’s belief that the world as he knew it had changed for the worse, I believe, is for some people, part of the natural process of getting older and having lived long enough to remember the “good ole’ days”, which was usually when they were thinner, stronger, richer, or simply had a fuller head of hair. I know that at this point in my life (and I am definitely not Steinbeck’s age), my friends and I do it all of the time. And—I will apologize ahead of the time—I will be constantly doing it, as I relate these books to the experiences I have gone through throughout my life, on this blog (oh, I remember when…)
However, some people might call Steinbeck a big Fake, who has compromised the author/reader relationship by lying about what he actually did. While I can completely understand that attitude, I won’t take him to task about his big fat lies because, truthfully, as long as I enjoyed what I am reading, I could care less whether it is fiction or non-fiction (to a certain point).
The knowledge that Steinbeck wrote the book in the comfort
of his hotel, did explain for me the way he glazed over certain aspects of the
trip. For example, when he visited his
son’s school to say good-bye, I found it weird that he did not actually mention
his son’s reaction to his appearance or anything else, all Steinbeck mentioned
was that the student’s were in awe of Rocinante. How does Steinbeck explain this? He says “I
prefer to draw a curtain over my visit…” (27)
Huh? Yeah, well, now I know why.
Also, I have to mention his trip home. What was that??? One moment
Steinbeck is supposedly taking a leisurely trip around America , the
next he’s basically racing home because he misses his wife. Again, huh? I
thought it was kind of weird that he spent 250 or so pages talking about his
experiences as he drove West and a few pages on his return trip. I, definitely, got the distinct feeling that
something wasn’t right, which was confirmed when I learned that he probably
didn’t even make it to half the places he said he went. Still, the book was
cool with me.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.